I. The District Court violated the Defendant's Fifth and
Sixth Amendment rights by excluding evidence and Arg
ument under Fed. R. Evid . 412, specifically that one
of the alleged victims engaged in prostitution before
the alleged crimes in this case and lied during the
Investigation .

II. The District Court erred by denying Defendant's request
for Jury instructions concerning the Kidnapping elements
of consent before transportation of the alleged victim
and withdrawal of consent after initially consenting.

III. The District Court erred by denying Defendant's request
for Jury instructions on the knowledge element to the
Counts of Transportation of Minors.

IV. The District Court erred in allowing the Government to
admit certain evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b).

V. The District Court erred '.in Allowing the Government to
admit certain evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 413.

Vi. The District Court erred in denying Defendant's Motion
for a new trial.

Exclusion of evidence on prostitution and lying by alleged victim