No. 23-5881

In Re David Jah, Sr.

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-10-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights commercial-purpose conviction-standard due-process jury-determination legal-interpretation local-ordinance property-use standing takings zoning
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration ERISA DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-12-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Can a conviction stand on a jury's determination [a] subject property was used for a commercial purpose albeit according to the local ordinance in the Town the subject property is located the requirement's are not niet for the property to be deemed used for a commercial purpose?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a conviction can stand on a jury's determination that the subject property was used for a commercial purpose, despite the local ordinance requirements not being met for the property to be deemed used for a commercial purpose

Docket Entries

2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-19
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 24, 2023)

Attorneys

David Jah
David Jah Sr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent