Darryl Smith v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
1) IN A 18 USC 1258 HABEAS CORPUS (APPEALING A CRIMINAL CONVICTION) CAN JUDGes AND MAGISTRATES OF A U.S. DIST. COURT COLLECTIVELY CRAFT ORDERS TO IMPOSE A VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR TAG ON A PRO SE PRISONER AND BAN HIS FILINGS TO APPEAL HIS CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS AND IMPRISONMENT.
2) IN A 18 USC 1258 HABEAS CORPUS CASE, CAN JUDGES AND MAGISTRATES USE THE VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR TAG TO BAN AND SHUT DOWN A PRO SE PRISONER'S PLEADINGS WHO IS APPEALING HIS CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS AND IMPRISONMENT.
3) IN A 18 USC 1258 HABEAS CORPUS CASE, CAN JUDGES USE, RELY ON AND "BORROW" A VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR BAN ORDERS BY ANOTHER JUDGE (NOT ASSIGNING TO THE HABEAS CORPUS CASE) TO SHUT DOWN AND BAN A PROSE PRISONERS PLEADINGS WHO IS APPEALING HIS CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS AND IMPRISONMENT.
4) IN A 18 USC 1258 HABEAS CORPUS CASE, CAN JUDGES ARBITRARILY IMPOSE A "BORROWED" VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR BAN ON A PRO SE PRISONER (WHO IS APPEALING HIS CRIMINAL CONVICTION) WITHOUT ANY DUE PROCESS PROCEDURAL HEARING TO ALLOW THE PRISONER TO CONTEST THE SANCTION AND BE HEARD.
5) IN A 18 USC 1258 HABEAS CORPUS CASE CAN JUDGES IMPOSE A "BORROWED" VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR BAN ON A PROSE PRISONER CONTESTING HIS CONVICTIONS AND SILENCE HIS ACTUAL INNOCENCE CLAIMS THAT IS SUPPORTED BY INNOCENCE EVIDENCE.
Whether judges and magistrates can collectively craft orders to impose a vexatious litigator tag on a pro se prisoner and ban his filings to appeal his criminal convictions and imprisonment