No. 23-5857
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: autonomy-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defense-strategy due-process faretta-v-california guilty-plea mccoy-v-louisiana right-to-control-defense right-to-self-representation self-representation trial-court-discretion
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-01-19
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a guilty plea inherently waives claims that the trial court violated a defendant's autonomy-based rights, such as the right to self-representation and the right to control the objective of his defense?
2. Whether the trial court's ruling that counsel could concede guilt over Moody's objection violated this Court's decision in McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S. Ct. 1500 (2018), rendering Moody's guilty plea involuntary?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a guilty plea waives claims that the trial court violated a defendant's autonomy-based rights
Docket Entries
2024-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2023-12-27
Electronic record (contains sealed records) transmitted from Supreme Court of Georgia.
2023-12-20
Record Requested.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-04
Reply of petitioner Jeremy Moody filed.
2023-11-21
Brief of respondent Georgia in opposition filed.
2023-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2023)
2023-08-04
Application (23A104) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until October 19, 2023.
2023-08-01
Application (23A104) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 19, 2023 to October 19, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Georgia
Sabrina D. Graham — Senior Assistant Attorney General, Respondent
Jeremy Moody
Michael Boland Admirand — Southern Center for Human Rights, Petitioner