& k WTAiT O £ / rffiz&ffr ?> bft2&kr 7tfT
krAOVCf or Tttfc STATET 7 ,
T^et TlAT T d>^'f Quf CPAirprn^Xi)^ 5At £ 0°S
Hk<& PCX {&&?(, M ujpmK

J- MoJJ /'At In/IT pfcj/lo r £5 7 ft AT fiAtXV io OJM c/yst £ cA^f CAY ( cAJrf ffTT f<A/T /kMtt f&r
CMf'lKf Pfiol^ QusKF. <

(W^/lT C&h£ (TKRF iTo, T KMr 4-
/lS*vVT. ^ cHAM>T^ C\A>ks SHOA L N-Atywf
AP0 AyfiAATtti oA t^iAML octASTeMvr?

IhkX^P^ WP-P/WO^, 00T Ty Tftfer
,/Vor TV fyAN&m u)t(Y CATkfiNAL prfisav^ -pstn5

Pd /iM (A6k0N^- u^WE fe(V MT LfWVi Ar
i^p5 f <■ \\Akbi55 .*?

SU6\)U) HAOlf 4<Tok MY tfcH&LF. k IPAr
jWtfXAd-Y iO(U>A6 /MTMATY /MO fcyXXALLY,?r

Whether the state's actions in this case violated the petitioner's constitutional rights