No. 23-5846
Jong Whan Kim v. United States
Amici (1)Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2023-11-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is it error for a district court to rely on a defendant's pre-hearing review of the indictment to inform him of the nature of the offense?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it error for a district court to rely on a defendant's pre-hearing review of the indictment to inform him of the nature of the offense?
Docket Entries
2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-16
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Professor Brandon L. Garrett and the Wilson Center for Science and Justice at Duke Law.
2023-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 20, 2023)
2023-09-07
Application (23A222) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 18, 2023.
2023-09-01
Application (23A222) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 18, 2023 to October 18, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Jong Kim
Michelle Ann Liguori — Ellis & Winters LLP, Petitioner
Professor Brandon L. Garrett and the Wilson Center for Science and Justice at Duke Law
Matthew Nis Leerberg — Fox Rothschild LLP, Amicus
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent