James Franklin Snyder v. United States, et al.
1. Qcl«\ Vdoko txac. ,5oo udh S OV\d TerwkwfiJpg. OOr "Wbkfcs \ckjA l ^OrcJrveA do ^iep l n md^-S trav'O cfakg kjd A^A TideiL cWvy' SeWias, tVdjfmws mv4 (k*arc(?
2. Cdn A ^^ored, 6^3rder Sw^<W "fo -kme/ui Coyn^kd k/^ 1^ ld<xko ok CbrrexdccJV\^ Ia>^ \{\ofco{\j^
3. Wcrvq 3H<er Vs TBX ^ Sbim -c WW™ [UW a* ^
4. In MX IS ^ VJbU^rtfe, S0«^ « Ao yoVu AW, dm\d SW«r i*P£N^Ui^A^.S^ '5 KenU^ til. [yferLct is «rUoSw «WvV fix ^ 6»mo Uy*y .
5. Can. tAr "S'uj^k X Wat-C«MrV. rejwA W^-. nva^^k Oc- ^ *Td™ k, w+ h 44-5 r d'*^i Sfll fc'kv st-fw sbrc "«if V v suited ^osf.lsMta kw VM, \^. {t Vil ^ °^5t* VW;SW; Z-7% d^fcU fetfLy do4 \f<ti\ ask "VVis ^r): k> cleade v/ l^ivurez^ 7Xrl(e03> avia ask UcW sMtSlf\C£ er h QLndexjA ^dAefe tike, <sd\ui 4k 'a0 q tfv\ (Mr \^as&( tfn d<-5(tUlliWc5. liaskWWs u>0 kkrcuaas?ojVcyv^ \ckl/^o ^ kc^JT^WAs 00iV<K Vvo/vo run iLS.IV.te hid3 Cwae'C cvs )^-Wi Ofl»d kr S'Ujd'&f V ^loiHSov) AO, G*n \cUko 1,0'OvC. ^ WW v - Peck as V* 9^ *** ^cL ^/va4er S^jri^du^.AJk^ <4 Wjd and sW of Iom) litte^yy r ^5 ^ ok U1tn
Can the State Department of Corrections terminate an inmate's access to legal materials and services in retaliation for the inmate's filing of a civil rights complaint?