No. 23-5790
Brock Brian Beeman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-waiver circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process fourth-circuit notice-requirements plea-agreement rule-32 sentencing sentencing-notice
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Fourth Circuit err in upholding the Petitioner's appeal waiver to preclude his claim that the trial court violated the notice provisions of Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Fourth Circuit err in upholding the Petitioner's appeal waiver to preclude his claim that the trial court violated the notice provisions of Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure?
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2023)
Attorneys
Brock Beeman
William Jeffrey Dinkin — William J. Dinkin, PLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent