Roberto Buendia v. United States
Whether the standard the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals applied for determining if the sentencing Guidelines' error in Buendia's case was "plain" conflicts with the reasoning in this Court's decisions in Molina-Martinez v. United States, 578 U.S. 189 (2016), Rosales-Mireles v. United States, 585 U.S. __, 138 S. Ct. 1897 (2018), and Davis v. United States, 589 U.S. __, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (2020). And whether this Court should grant certiorari to clarify the standard for determining the second prong of plain-error review.
Whether the standard the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals applied for determining if the sentencing Guidelines' error in Buendia's case was 'plain' conflicts with the reasoning in this Court's decisions in Molina-Martinez v. United States, Rosales-Mireles v. United States, and Davis v. United States