1. When Detective Lopez told Petitioner that his statement could
be used in his favor, did Detective Lopez subverted the Miranda
warning, thus, rendered the statement in voluntary and violating
his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination?

2. Did the Third Circuit erred in deferring to the state court's
finding that Petitioner was not prejudiced by trial counsel's
failure to supply the courts with additional critical information
at the suppression hearing; which could of have changed the
outcome at suppression hearing such as fear of police,
neurological conditions (mental health) ?

When Detective Lopez told Petitioner that his statement could be used in his favor, did Detective Lopez subverted the Miranda warning, thus, rendered the statement in voluntary and violating his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination?