No. 23-5768
Frank Nathan Escalante v. Jim Robertson, Warden
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-claims criminal-procedure due-process federal-review habeas-corpus miscarriage-of-justice ninth-circuit procedural-rights standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was Petitioner's due Process Violated at any time through Judicial Proceedings?
2. Was Petitioner's Trial "fundamentally unfair"?
3. Has Petitioner made a Substantial Showing that a reversal is indeed Possible by a Simple Conclusion of a Jury via sit action?
4. Is there a Miscarriage of Justice?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Frank Nathan Escalante's due process rights were violated at any stage of the judicial proceedings
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-11-21
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-11-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
2023-10-17
Waiver of right of respondent Robertson, Warden to respond filed.
2023-08-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Frank N. Escalante
Frank Nathan Escalante — Petitioner
Robertson, Warden
Xiomara Costello — Respondent