No. 23-5762
Isaiah Whitefox Redbird v. United States
Tags: where context made the basis of his objection to criminal-procedure evidence-preservation federal-rules-of-evidence plain-error-review preservation-requirement propensity-evidence tenth-circuit
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Tenth Circuit incorrectly hold that Mr. Redbird's claim was not preserved, where context made the basis of his objection to exclude the prosecution's propensity evidence clear, and therefore satisfied the preservation requirement of Federal Rule of Evidence 103?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Tenth Circuit incorrectly hold that Mr. Redbird's claim was not preserved, where context made the basis of his objection to exclude the prosecution's propensity evidence clear, and therefore satisfied the preservation requirement of Federal Rule of Evidence 103?
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Isaiah Whitefox Redbird
Howard A. Pincus — Fed Pub. Def. for Dist. CO &WY, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent