No. 23-5759
Meredith McConnell v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-indictment false-statements federal-statute materiality neder-v-united-states ninth-circuit omissions wire-fraud
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does an indictment charging the offense of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, require pleading and proof of a specific false statement or omission, or is the allegation of an unspecified "material scheme to defraud" sufficient to state all elements of the offense?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does an indictment charging the offense of wire fraud require pleading and proof of a specific false statement or omission, or is the allegation of an unspecified 'material scheme to defraud' sufficient?
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Meredith McConnell
Nancy G. Schwartz — N.G. Schwartz Law, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent