No. 23-5756
David Davalos, Sr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-forfeiture criminal-law due-process Fifth-Circuit forfeiture Honeycutt-v-United-States property-rights property-seizure statutory-interpretation tainted-property
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Honeycutt v. United States, 581 U.S. 443 (2017) and its progeny require the Fifth Circuit to limit forfeiture to tainted property the defendant himself actually acquired as the result of the crime.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Honeycutt-v-United-States-requires-limiting-forfeiture-to-tainted-property-defendant-actually-acquired
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)
Attorneys
David Davalos
Nelson Starbranch Ebaugh — Nelson S. Ebaugh, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent