No. 23-5753

Ben J. Latham v. Alaska

Lower Court: Alaska
Docketed: 2023-10-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process ex-post-facto fourteenth-amendment punishment punitive-law retroactivity right-to-counsel sentencing sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2023-12-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Is AS 12 72 020CK BMA) Punitive EV Pest forp,

2. IS AS 12 72 626(W@ Punitive E¥ Post Lavy Prok- bi ted Stylo te

2. Wes Lottan dened of the SwovingsS clause OF SLA IIIS Ch.19 Sec.qo under the Feotheenp, amenomen€,

4G. tS AS 18 BS punitive E¥ fost Kael, Prohibited Stateute a St Ss fhe Fouctheents Arendren€,

(o. was Letham Denied his St¥ Amendment Kigh#t th Couns el ;

j2-TR-625 . LS AS RE Psritive Ey fost Facto Prohibited Sfatute,

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the retroactive application of a punitive ex post facto law is prohibited under the Fourteenth Amendment

Docket Entries

2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-13
Waiver of right of respondent Alaska to respond filed.
2023-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)

Attorneys

Alaska
Tamara Eve DeLuciaState of Alaska Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Ben Latham
Ben J. Latham — Petitioner