No. 23-5753
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process ex-post-facto fourteenth-amendment punishment punitive-law retroactivity right-to-counsel sentencing sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is AS 12 72 020CK BMA) Punitive EV Pest forp,
2. IS AS 12 72 626(W@ Punitive E¥ Post Lavy Prok- bi ted Stylo te
2. Wes Lottan dened of the SwovingsS clause OF SLA IIIS Ch.19 Sec.qo under the Feotheenp, amenomen€,
4G. tS AS 18 BS punitive E¥ fost Kael, Prohibited Stateute a St Ss fhe Fouctheents Arendren€,
(o. was Letham Denied his St¥ Amendment Kigh#t th Couns el ;
j2-TR-625 . LS AS RE Psritive Ey fost Facto Prohibited Sfatute,
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the retroactive application of a punitive ex post facto law is prohibited under the Fourteenth Amendment
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-13
Waiver of right of respondent Alaska to respond filed.
2023-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Alaska
Ben Latham
Ben J. Latham — Petitioner