I. DOES THIS SUPREME COURT FINDS THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 'S SELECTIVE
ADJUDICATION AND UNDERMINING THE LAW OF THIS COURT
ACCEPTABLE WHEN IT AFFIRMED THE DISTRICT COURT 'S RULING
FOR CONDUCT THAT DID NOT COME WITHIN THE STATUTORY
DEFINITION OF THE CRIME?

II. DOES THIS SUPREME COURT AGREE WITH THE DISTRICT COURT AND
THE GOVERNMENT ADDING THE ELEMENTS OF ATTEMPT TO
STATUTES THAT CONGRESS CREATED THAT DOES NOT HAVE THE
ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF ATTEMPT?

III. WHETHER THE APPEALS COURT ERRED WHEN IT DENIED THE COA
THAT CLEARLY MET THE CRITERIA OF 28 U.S.C. 2253 (C) (2)?

Does the Fifth Circuit's selective adjudication and undermining the law of this Court's ruling on conduct outside the statutory definition of a crime acceptable?