No. 23-5742
Joseph Michael Easton v. United States
Tags: 2nd-amendment commerce-clause constitutional-challenge criminal-law due-process federal-criminal-law firearm-possession interstate-commerce second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm that
has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially
unconstitutional?
Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1) comports with the Second Amendment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially unconstitutional?
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 9, 2023)
Attorneys
Joseph Easton
Kevin Joel Page — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent