No. 23-573
Tina Bastian Veneskey v. Michael Keith Sulier
Tags: custody custody-determination due-process error-of-law fourteenth-amendment full-faith-and-credit jurisdiction jurisdictional-determination legal-error state-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Full Faith and Credit Clause precludes the enforcement of a State's jurisdictional determination when that very determination is based upon an error of law.
2. Whether a State's failure to afford a party a meaningful opportunity to be heard prior to a custody determination is violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Full Faith and Credit Clause precludes the enforcement of a State's jurisdictional determination when that very determination is based upon an error of law
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 28, 2023)
Attorneys
Tina Veneskey
Andrew Jackson Wingo — Homesley and Wingo Law Group, PLLC, Petitioner