Whether the district Court can deny a Motion To Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 that argued that the Court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to hold a trial if the court in fact did not have subject matter jurisdiction although for reasons other than those argued in the petition and whether an appeals Court may affirm such a denial?

Whether De Azar court withheld evidence in a habeas corpus 2255 proceeding in violation of the due process clause pitting Brady v. Maryland and Brady v. Cunningham against the Court ethic?

Whether De AZAR court failed to give the mandated Whereof constin Monn out ing the Appellate Court, Writ Audially 2255 note.

Whether the district court correctly dismissed a motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction