I. WHETHER THE INFLICTION OF A LIFE SENTENCE UPON A PRISONER WHERE THE LIFE TAIL IS NOT APPLICABLE TO HIS OFFENSE OF CONVICTION CONSTITUTES CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT?

II. WHETHER A CLAIM OF RES JUDICATA STEMMING FROM AN INTERVENING COURT DECISION CHANGING PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS REGARDING VOID SENTENCES CAN LIE TO PREVENT CORRECTION OF A VOID SENTENCE WITHOUT VIOLATION DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW?

Whether the infliction of a life sentence upon a prisoner where the life tail is not applicable to his offense of conviction constitutes cruel and unusual punishment?