1) Whether the Sixth Circuit's Threshold Determination of No Compelling Reasons Under the First Step Act of 2018 for Compassionate Release is Erroneous and Overly Searching and Violates the Law Given to the District Court Code's Discretion Explained in Conception v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2389 (2022). For extraordinary

2) Whether a Sentencing Disparity Created by Non-Retroactive Changes to a Mandatory Sentencing Scheme Can Constitute an Extraordinary and Compelling Reason to Stand for Compassionate Release Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(1)(A), Denying Petitioner's Born or Indicted in the District Circuits that Say "No" Equal Protection that Other Petitioners are Receiving in the Circuits that Say "Yes" Prior to the

3) Whether the Sixth Circuit's Discretion as Decision to Fix a New Compassionate Release Sentence Made by the Courts and the Office(s) of the Court Through the Compassionate Release Statute are Erroneous and Warrants Habeas Review by State Courts Inspect Judge's Reversal of

Whether the Sixth Circuit's threshold for extraordinary and compelling reasons under the First Step Act of 2018 Compassionate Release is erroneous and overly searching and violates the law given to the District Court judges' discretion explained in Concepcion v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2364 (2022)