No. 23-5689
Philip Jones v. Charles Schuyler, Acting Warden
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miller-el-v-cockrell ninth-circuit slack-v-mcdaniel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-10-27
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Ninth Circuit's refusal to issue a certificate of appealability for Jones's ineffective assistance of counsel claim conflict with this Court's decisions in Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000), and Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2003)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit's refusal to issue a certificate of appealability for Jones's ineffective assistance of counsel claim conflict with this Court's decisions in Slack v. McDaniel and Miller-El v. Cockrell?
Docket Entries
2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-10-09
Waiver of right of respondent Charles Schuyler, et al. to respond filed.
2023-10-02
Motion (23M20) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2023-08-16
MOTION (23M20) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-10
Motion (23M20) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2023-08-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2023)
Attorneys
Charles Schuyler, et al.
William Hyunmin Shin — California Department of Justice, Respondent
Philip Jones
Devon Lashae Hein — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner