No. 23-5685
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure court-jurisdiction federal-procedure jurisdiction mandamus motion-to-dismiss non-discretionary-duty rule-12b1 standing subject-matter subject-matter-jurisdiction writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2023-10-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
IS PETITIONER ENTITLED TO IMMEDIATE RELIEF, INCLUDING A WRIT OF MANDAMUS FROM THIS COURT, TO COMPEL THE LOWER COURT(S) TO ADJUDICATE PETITIONER'S FED. R CIV P 12(B)(1) MOTION WITH RESPECT TO A NON-DISCRETIONARY DUTY OF THE LOWER COURT(S) TO ESTABLISH THEIR JURISDICTION OVER THE SUBJECT-MATTER?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner is entitled to immediate relief, including mandamus from this Court, to compel the lower court(s) to adjudicate petitioner's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) motion which is a non-discretionary duty of the lower court(s) to establish their jurisdiction over the subject-matter
Docket Entries
2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-10-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-04-25
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2023)
Attorneys
Bobby Richardson
Bobby Richardson — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent