No. 23-565
Hasbro, Inc., et al. v. Markham Concepts, Inc., et al.
Tags: attorneys-fees circuit-split copyright copyright-act-section-505 copyright-law discretion judicial-discretion kirtsaeng-standard kirtsaeng-v-john-wiley prevailing-party
Key Terms:
Copyright JusticiabilityDoctri
Copyright JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
What is the appropriate standard for awarding attorneys' fees to a prevailing party under Section 505 of the Copyright Act?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is the appropriate standard for awarding attorneys' fees to a prevailing party under Section 505 of the Copyright Act?
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-09
Reply of petitioners Hasbro, Inc., et al. filed.
2024-01-26
Brief of respondents Markham Concepts, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2023-12-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 26, 2024.
2023-12-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 27, 2023 to January 26, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 27, 2023)
2023-09-13
Application (23A235) granted by Justice Jackson extending the time to file until November 20, 2023.
2023-09-08
Application (23A235) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 20, 2023 to November 19, 2023, submitted to Justice Jackson.
Attorneys
Hasbro, Inc., et al.
Peter K. Stris — Stris and Maher LLP, Petitioner
Markham Concepts, Inc., et al.
Kevin K. Russell — Goldstein, Russell & Woofter LLC, Respondent