1. Did Trial Counsel Fail to Adequately inform Defendant
of the Consequences of Accepting the Plea Bargain?

2. Was the Strickland V. Washington standard of review
for ineffective assistance of counsel ,Fustrated by the
lower Court's failure to notice ,objective record
evidence, that can satisfy the COA mandate in the defendant 's
favor? Was the lower Court's findings based upon clear
misinterpretations of the record, and mere speculations,
adequate to deny defendant's motion 2255?

3. Was the defendant deprived Due Process by the lower Court's,
when the District Court, and the Circuit Court fail to
notice, Clear record evidence ,That will Contradict the
Government's witness's testimony? Testimony that will have
critical force in the outcome of the case, and it's denial.

4. Has the Circuit Court commited reversable error / or
manifest error (by not noticing the district court's failure
to consider evidence that,will dispute the district Court's
findings of fact , when the evidence was presented by the
defendant's attorney to the District Court, and then clearly
presented to the Circuit Court on post judgement appeal,
and pro - se petition by the defendant?

5. Has the Petitioner satisfied the COA mandate, and experienced
Prejudice that will render his Plea Invalid? Was the petitioner
provided with Constitutionally Competent advice,by his attorney?

Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel