In light of the facts of this case, was the defense counsel ineffective in light of this court's precedent in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)?

Did the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals err in not granting a certificate of appealability as required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2253(¢)(1)(B) and Fed.R.App.P. 22(b)(1)?

In light of this court's decision in Rehaif v. United States, 2019 U.S. Lexis 4199 (2019) is the indictment for firearm possession by a convicted felon under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), as well as the subsequent conviction for the same offense, both constitutionally flawed?

Was the defense counsel ineffective under Strickland v. Washington?