Adrian M. Jackson v. Clinton Canady, III, Judge, et al.
QUESTON NUMBER ONE:
Whether the Sixth Circuit abused its discretion by committing a
factual error in which likely impacted the outcome of their Decision,
thus, does this justify VACATING and REMANDING their affirmance of
the district court's decision ?
QUESTION NUMBER TWO:
Whether the Sixth Circuit abused its discretion by affirmance of the
district court clearly erred by failing to afford Mr. Jackson an
opportunity to pursue discovery and whom discovery have not been
answered but was ruled to be moot, thus, does this justify VACATING
and REMANDING the Dismissal of Civil Rights Civil Suit ?
QUESTION NUMBER THREE:
Whether the Sixth Circuit abused its discretion by affirmance of the
district court clearly erred by Dismissing Section 1983 Civil Suit Action
as a genuine issue as to any material fact existed, thus, does this justify
VACATING and REMANDING the Dismissal of Civil Rights Civil Suit and
to set the matter for Trial ?
whether-the-sixth-circuit-abused-its-discretion