No. 23-5631
Jason M. Moriarty v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: consecutive-sentences criminal-law criminal-procedure imprisonment maximum-sentence revocation-of-release sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation supervised-release
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-10-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
When revoking multiple terms of supervised release and requiring a defendant "to serve in prison all or part of the term of supervised release," may the court run the "serv[ice] in prison" on each term consecutively to achieve an aggregate length of "serv[ice] in prison" that exceeds the maximum authorized for one term?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When revoking multiple terms of supervised release, may the court run the service in prison on each term consecutively to exceed the maximum authorized for one term?
Docket Entries
2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-09-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 23, 2023)
2023-09-11
Application (23A125) denied by Justice Thomas.
2023-09-06
Application (23A125) to extend further the time from September 19, 2023 to October 19, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
2023-08-14
Application (23A125) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until September 19, 2023.
2023-08-08
Application (23A125) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 20, 2023 to September 20, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Jason Moriarty
Lynn Palmer Bailey — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent