No. 23-5610

Justin D. Shackelford v. University of Minnesota, et al.

Lower Court: Minnesota
Docketed: 2023-09-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: ada administrative-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights discrimination due-process employment federal-employment standing state-agency state-federal-conflict unemployment-law
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-11-17
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Can a state agency inflict an unemployment determination that contravenes the Federal Amendment's, with bisWlrli-es /Vef ?

2. Can a state agency an a state court violate the state's no nicker oversight" accountability ?

3. Can a state Court make a decision that contradicts a federal Amendment with bisW l(4ier y4W?

4. Can a state Court make a ruling "that includes Constitutional rights ?OLov^ Statutes uil-Vt overv-uJe*?

5. Can a state Court make a ruling that does not take any employee Conduct into consideration in unemployment cases where the applicant is in a protected class under state and federal law and the employer Conduct a violation of state and federal Ability discrimination laws, which employer conduct and was discriminatory in nature?

6. Can a state Court and federal state as in federal States law establish present priority for perjury arrears?

7. Can a state Court of Appeals admit evidence in an Affidavit Brief that is not within a ruling and ruling show it had valid ?

8. Can the Court of Appeals allow conduct a Court of perjury committed by a respondent ?

9. Can an employer in violation of state and federal laws and in violation of a bargaining agreement be considered subject to testimony in Court?

10. Can judges who are affiliated with only one of the parties make a fair and exact ruling, or should they excuse themselves from a case?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a state agency make an unemployment determination that contradicts the federal Americans with Disabilities Act?

Docket Entries

2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-09-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 19, 2023)

Attorneys

Justin D. Shackelford
Justin D. Shackelford — Petitioner