(1). DID THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS COMMIT A REVERSIBLE
ERROR WHEN IT RESOLVED THE MERITS OF YOUR PETITIONER'S
CRIMINAL DIRECT APPEALS REVIEW WITHOUT FIRST ASKING AND
ANSWERING THE THRESHOLD JURISDICTION QUESTION ALL REVIEWING
COURT*S MUST FIRST RESOLVE BEFORE PROCEEDING TO A MERITS
DETERMINATION?

(2). DID THE KANSAS DISTRICT COURT DEVOID ITSELF OF SUBJECT AND
PERSONAL MATTER JURISDICTION WHEN THE COURT DISMISSED THE
GRAND JURY'S JUNE 21, 2011, FIRST SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT
IN YOUR PETITIONER'S CRIMINAL CASE?

(3). CAN A FEDERAL DEFENDANT BE TRIED IN A DISTRICT COURT AFTER
THE COURT DISMISSES THE GRAND JURY'S SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT
'AND WITHOUT ANY NEW INDICTMENT RETURNED IN THE CRIMINAL CASE?

Did the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals commit a reversible error when it resolved the merits of the petitioner's criminal direct appeals review without first asking and answering the threshold jurisdiction question?