IS PETITIONER'S FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATED BY THE RULE ANNOUNCED IN LEWIS v. CASEY; TOO NARROW BY BEING STRICTLY FOR ATTACKS ON CRIMINAL SENTENCES AND PRISON CONDITIONS WHEN PRISON OFFICIAL'S DELIBERATELY INTERFERE AND IMPEDE PRISONER'S ACCESS WITH OTHER LEGAL ACTIONS; IN WHICH THE PROSECUTION MANUFACTURES PRE-TRIAL CRIMINAL EVIDENCE BY EXTRINSIC FRAUD ON AN EX PARTE PROBATE COURT?

DOES THE LEWIS DECISION REQUIRE EXPANSION DUE TO THE SECOND, THIRD, FOURTH, SEVENTH, NINTH AND TENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURTS ALL OBSERVE, "PRISONER RIGHT OF ACCESS-TO-THE-COURTS APPLIES BEYOND CRIMINAL LITIGATION AND PRISON CONDITIONS WHEN A NONFRIVOLOUS LEGAL CLAIM HAS BEEN FRUSTRATED OR IMPEDED; WHERE PETITIONER'S SIXTH CIRCUIT ADHERES TO LEWIS' STRICT LIMITATIONS?

Is Petitioner's First Amendment right of access to the courts violated by the rule announced in Lewis v. Casey being too narrow by strictly limiting it to attacks on criminal sentences and prison conditions when prison officials deliberately interfere and impede a prisoner's access to other legal actions, such as the prosecution's use of extrinsic fraud on an ex parte probate court proceeding?