No. 23-5568
Boaz Pleasant-Bey v. Jason Clendenion, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-delay constitutional-rights criminal-justice-system due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus sixth-circuit speedy-appeal standing
Latest Conference:
2023-11-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
I.) WHETHER THE 6th CIRCUIT 'S ORDER SO FAR DEPARTED FROM HOUSTON V. LACK AND EVITTS V. LUCY, REQUIRING THIS COURT 'S SUPERVISORY POWERS TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY, IMPARTIALITY, AND OVERALL FAIRNESS OF THE AMERICAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM?
II.) WHETHER CONFUSION IN THE U.S. COURTS OF APPEALS ON THE XIVTH AMEND. 'S RIGHT TO A SPEEDY APPEAL NEEDS UNIFORMITY, AND IF SO, DID THE 12 YEARS OF INORDINATE APPELLATE DELAY PREJUDICE PETITIONER 'S XIVTH AMEND. DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE SPEEDY APPEAL RIGHTS?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 6th Circuit's order departed from Houston v. Lack and Evitts v. Lucy
Docket Entries
2023-11-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
2023-09-22
Waiver of right of respondent Jason Clendenion to respond filed.
2023-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 16, 2023)
Attorneys
Boaz Pleasant-Bey
Boaz Pleasant-Bey — Petitioner
Jason Clendenion
Sarah J. Stone — Office of the TN Attorney General and Reporter, Respondent