No. 23-5552
Lei Yin v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-hearing civil-procedure civil-rights due-process evidence-tampering judicial-bias legal-procedure pro-se pro-se-rights standing worker-compensation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Patent
SocialSecurity DueProcess Patent
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Pro Se Rights shall be preserved in Court Systems in COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS?
2. In Civil Cases, including worker compensation case, under what condition those who cannot afford to hire a lawyer MUST be provided one at no cost?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Pro Se Rights shall be preserved in Court Systems in COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS?
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-11-14
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-11-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
2023-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. to respond filed.
2023-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 11, 2023)
Attorneys
Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co.
Robert S. Martin — Tentindo, Kendall, Canniff & Keefe, LLP, Respondent
Lei Yin
Lei Yin — Petitioner