No. 23-555
Louis A. Wilson v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-3582 circuit-split concepcion-v-united-states extraordinary-and-compelling-reasons extraordinary-reasons habeas habeas-corpus non-retroactive-law sentencing-commission sentencing-reduction u-s-sentencing-commission
Latest Conference:
2024-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), can non-retroactive changes in the law constitute "extraordinary and compelling reasons" authorizing a district court to reduce a prisoner's sentence?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can non-retroactive changes in the law constitute 'extraordinary and compelling reasons' authorizing a district court to reduce a prisoner's sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)?
Docket Entries
2024-03-25
Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2024-03-14
Supplemental brief of petitioner Louis A. Wilson filed. (Distributed)
2024-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2024-03-06
Reply of petitioner Louis A. Wilson filed. (Distributed)
2024-02-21
Memorandum of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-01-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 21, 2024.
2024-01-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 22, 2024 to February 21, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 22, 2024.
2023-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 22, 2023 to January 22, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 22, 2023)
2023-10-06
Application (23A299) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 20, 2023.
2023-10-03
Application (23A299) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 19, 2023 to November 20, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Louis A. Wilson
Anthony F. Shelley — Miller & Chevalier Chartered, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent