If J fife. 3 no-tic a of pap -le Ilin&JrAe,
an "ckXiaahon of contracts"-inferred ?H Vou OLr\
appeal is ibe.re.'3

^)iJ It Courts V16 kfe drticlz XS&cfioA lf)SI
ef ftit (J/CCondihuhon <?oi impoiiY 4\t^01pJma-f/b/l of
Contrac ts \}yirvipl(lw\t(\tinrp Virynia Cupvffnt. Court (file,
(y<i. 5op, 8 curiiwst ^iV/Wa 4vg ar
f)pportunitv to Ibe hearJ/pu<z Process \

— :-fke duds Is-iurig vested rights unii&r dZ
U- S>. (fofc loua (rights under the la
te acd enforce contra cfsfjitL VaAip.Ct,fL.5A ',B'*.D
lL& (HVj
i)
to bj ji f c
rm

-■ jf B&W > flppg/fa/rf. tfMUcJQosly lindihiMS&lf tinJ
\-oo people* (theJ> &e#n SoiciM accorjfn^ io 3# 6fR$3»2o2 %H)
Xr\ &CCorMin£e-6ji-li\ 38 6fJ?S 3*302 S) uj&S
appelUrrl' oSqIg -Iro^orm M+£.n+?

HTs 4LiS ar\ 6'X#mpl& of tJ/il&u/fd hJounJifi& f
U^xS MJiCicndi/ Pm$&jAeJ

CN^fcVej^J ih^mvdtfeJ AbliLltpS U)oi>fl]tfi(k (JrfbjftzJ
Z7
s) \ 600 Joes an ^ppe//amf Jg-ferm/fig, if a hnnZcnp^ i5
pp&gj bd&re.-fhe a

Was there an 'obligation of contracts' inferred?