1. Does the State Court Judge , Mark Goodwin and the other defendants First
Financial Bank and Davis and Delanois Law Firm have the right to invade plaintiffAppellant's Clarence Jackson's ,privacy rights by taking over his 14th amendment
Constitutional Rights to own and control property bequeath him from his brother's
"Will", Palko v Connecticut , 302 U.S. 319 , 325 (1937) ?

2. Can a defendant State Court Judge , Mark Goodson who is operating under the
color of law pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 engage in conduct evaluated as conspiracy and
fraud by the other two defendants to invade the 14th amendment right of the plaintiff ,
Clarence Jackson to be an executor and an heir as designated in his brother's , Hile
Jackson's , will and ultimately allowing the other defendants to completely take over
plaintiffs inherited property as a result which is denying plaintiff's access to his own
property a violation of the Bill of Rights (State Law ) as well , Palko v Connecticut , 302
U.S. 319 , 325 (1937 } ; Boilling vs Sharpe 347 U.S. 497 (1954 )

Does the State Court Judge, Mark Goodwin and the other defendants First Financial Bank and Davis and Delanois Law Firm have the right to invade Clarence Jackson's privacy rights by taking over his 14th amendment Constitutional Rights to own and control property bequeath him from his brother's 'Will'?