Was it constitutional to deny the right of an interpreter because of bilateral
sensorineural hearing loss?

Was it constitutional to deny the right of access to medical care and services by
not informing, providing, or transferring to a level one trauma center when loss
of life and limb was known?

Was it constitutional to use toe word "RETARD " when referring to Tamara Sue Harbec
as a patient in a life or death situation, and did Tamara Sue Harbec receive adequate
testing to assess and diagnose at onset to receive proper Gare and obtain an expert?

Will Tamara Sue Harbec suffered damage and harm from toe decision of toe lower courts
based on incorrect information, with no inquiry or investigation?

Will Tamara Sue Harbec continue to suffer undue harm and substantial risk of dying without
redress?

Was it constitutional to deny the right of an interpreter because of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss?