No. 23-5505
Jacques Lamar Walker v. Virginia
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4)IFP
Tags: bank-robbery criminal-procedure due-process evidence fourteenth-amendment trial-court witness-identification
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
(distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether The Supreme Court Of Virginia Erred In Refusing To Reverse Petitioner Jacques Lamar Walker's Convictions Because The Trial Court Violated The Due Process Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment When It Refused To Prescreen And Exclude A Witness's First-Time In-Court Identification Of Him As The Masked Bank Robber?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court of Virginia erred in refusing to reverse petitioner Jacques Lamar Walker's convictions
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-17
Rescheduled.
2024-01-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2024-01-08
Rescheduled.
2024-01-02
Reply of petitioner Jacques Lamar Walker filed. (Distributed)
2023-12-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024.
2023-12-11
Brief of respondent Virginia in opposition filed.
2023-10-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 11, 2023.
2023-10-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 9, 2023 to December 11, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-10-10
Response Requested. (Due November 9, 2023)
2023-10-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-10-02
Waiver of right of respondent Virginia to respond filed.
2023-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 2, 2023)
Attorneys
Jacques Lamar Walker
Paul Graham Beers — Glenn, Feldmann, Darby & Goodlatte, Petitioner
Virginia
Andrew Nathan Ferguson — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent