No. 23-5502
Juan Antonio Hernandez-Lopez v. United States
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-law discriminatory-purpose disparate-impact due-process equal-protection immigration-law racial-discrimination statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
When a law is originally adopted for an impermissible racially discriminatory purpose and continues to have a disparate impact, do subsequent amendments or reenactments cure any equal protection violation even if they do not address the original discriminatory intent?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a law originally enacted with a discriminatory purpose can be cured of an equal protection violation by subsequent amendments or reenactments that do not address the original discriminatory intent
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-10-27
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-09-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 1, 2023.
2023-09-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 2, 2023 to November 1, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 2, 2023)
Attorneys
Juan Hernandez-Lopez
Scott Andrew Martin — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent