No. 23-5495
SirMichael Dyess v. California
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion ada appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process evidence ineffective-counsel judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct post-conviction-review procedural-default
Latest Conference:
2023-10-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court violated ADA rights under Title II, whether the District Court's procedural and evidentiary rulings constituted an abuse of discretion, whether the District Judges' extrajudicial commentary about the case prejudiced reversal of the judgment
Docket Entries
2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 2, 2023)
Attorneys
SirMichael Dyess
SirMichael Dyess — Petitioner