1. Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals ' review of trial courts
decisions to admit or exclude expert testimony comport with the United
States Supreme Court 's decisions in Daubert v. Merrell Dow
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509, U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 2795, 125 L. Ed. 2d
469 (1993) and Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 152,
119 S. Ct. 1167, 143 L. Ed. 2d 238 (1999).

2. Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals ' legal analysis
regarding ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claims comport with
the United States Supreme Court 's decision in Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984).

Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' review of trial courts decisions to admit or exclude expert testimony comport with the United States Supreme Court's decisions in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael