No. 23-5488
Dywane Tousant v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-right constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review motion-denial ninth-circuit standard-of-review substantial-showing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Ninth Circuit Erred in Denying Tousant's Motion for Certificate of Appealability ("COA") Because He Has Made a Substantial Showing of the Denial of a Constitutional Right Because Jurists of Reason Could Disagree with the District Court's and Appellate Court's Resolution of His Constitutional Claims or Jurists Could Conclude the Issues Presented Are Adequate to Deserve Encouragement to Proceed Further.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit Erred in Denying Tousant's Motion for Certificate of Appealability
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 29, 2023)
Attorneys
Dywane Tousant
Dywane Tousant — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent