Should a local government be dismissed from acceptance of claims and the very beginning of a suit with prejudice giving absolute immunity without allowing time for factual allegations, evidence, documentation and record to be established for the negligent acts of their police officer according to 42 U.S.C § 1983 or the Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act?

Whether a police officer may reasonably rely on a narrow exception to a specific and clearly established right to shield him from civil liability when his conduct far exceeds the limits of that exception?

Whether a police officer can use the defense of Qualified Immunity according to an intentional tort of assault and battery?

Whether a police officer motivation or intent is relevant concerning a 42 U.S.C § 1983 claim or according to the Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act, TCA 202 and TCA 205 governing a police officer negligence?

Whether a Final Judgment Order is valid if that order fails to list or mention a state claim with supplemental jurisdiction?

Should a local government be dismissed from acceptance of claims and the very beginning of a suit with prejudice giving absolute immunity without allowing time for factual allegations, evidence, documentation and record to be established for the negligent acts of their police officer according to 42 U.S.C § 1983 or the Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act?