No. 23-5458
Kimeo Delmar Conley v. Jason Wells, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment burden-of-proof constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence fourth-amendment jury-instructions sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When Criminal statute has [8] elements on its face (wis stat) (144.051) to be Proved beyond a Reasonable doubt and the state only tries to prove [3] elements, Does this violate the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, that requires that Due Process requires that the Prosecution Prove beyond a Reasonable doubt all elements in the definition of the offense
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-31
Waiver of right of respondent Wells, Warden to respond filed.
2023-07-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 27, 2023)
Attorneys
Kimeo D. Conley
Kimeo Delmar Conley — Petitioner
Wells, Warden
Sarah Lynn Burgundy — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent