1) Given the parties' histories, Did the Oregon Appellate court err, denying (2) separate alarming contacts of live gunfire in the direction of an easement roadway within 100 ' of Plaintiff, under Oregon's Stalking statute (ORS 30.866), and should these 2 incidences have been prima facie and/or err apparent on the record?

2) Would the reckless driving alarming contact towards plaintiffs senior citizen father be considered an alarming contact for the purposes of two incidences necessary for a permanent SPO, and would a requesting judicial notice for those litigated prior cases within a 2 year period be sufficient for making a claim?

3)Would a Civil Jury trial be mandatory, independent to determine the facts for civil damages prior to a case in chief criminal misdemeanor stalking hearing under ORS 30.866, that Oregon also does not provide a criminal jury trial?

4) Whether the Oregon Appellate court can award Costs to Respondents in a misdemeanor stalking case contrary to statutes?

Whether the Oregon Appellate court erred in denying separate alarming contacts of live gunfire within 100' of Plaintiff under Oregon's Stalking statute