No. 23-5410
Sedrick D. Russell v. J. Denmark
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process exhaustion-doctrine habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice pro-se-petition sixth-amendment standing
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Must a pro se petitioner alleging a complete denial of counsel specifically cite Cronic to exhaust his claim in the state court?
If a detained criminal defendant has no communication with a lawyer for 14 months after arrest, is prejudice presumed?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Must a pro se petitioner alleging a complete denial of counsel specifically cite Cronic to exhaust his claim in the state court?
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-11-29
Reply of petitioner Sedrick D. Russell filed.
2023-11-17
Brief of respondent J. Denmark in opposition filed.
2023-09-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 17, 2023.
2023-09-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 18, 2023 to November 17, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-09-18
Response Requested. (Due October 18, 2023)
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-11
Waiver of right of respondent J. Denmark to respond filed.
2023-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 20, 2023)
Attorneys
J. Denmark
Jerrolyn Martin Owens — Mississippi Attorney General's, Respondent
Sedrick D. Russell
Alysson Leigh Mills — Petitioner