No. 23-54
Robert Mark Scott v. Forcht Bank, N.A.
Response WaivedRelisted (3)
Tags: circuit-court civil-procedure detrimental-reliance false-testimony loan-officer material-facts material-issues-of-fact promissory-estoppel reliance summary-judgment
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Summary Judgment is proper where material issues of fact exist?
2. Whether Scott detrimentally relied on any promise made by and through Forcht Bank's employee, Chris Jasper?
3. Whether the Circuit Court erred in granting a Summary Judgment where evidence exists of false testimony by a key witness: Forcht loan officer, Mike Sharp?
4. Whether the Circuit Court erred in overruling Plaintiffs Motion to Reconsider?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Summary Judgment is proper where material issues of fact exist?
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-10-26
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-15
Waiver of right of respondent Forcht Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2023-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 21, 2023)
Attorneys
Forcht Bank, N.A.
M. Thurman Senn — Morgan Pottinger McGarvey, Respondent
Robert Mark Scott
Robert Mark Scott — Petitioner