No. 23-5399
Milton Melvin Rodgers v. California
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-provisions court-procedure criminal-procedure due-process evidence jurisdictional-issue legal-writ search-and-seizure statutory-provisions
Latest Conference:
2023-10-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
Cm, f_j:_shou\A (kc\\g 4k &(lauxr^ \^cWl yelloA of iquk
Mi>q. <X ^jkj^AgLSpe &eSeion of a tixeAfm
!?^iso0*Ljy2^QsA-^^
X- A\A nrel ^,,A A
fc/uAg*, U)K\ck yui^^
_^hAe ^Cg. Co^2- 35*1 aM PeyA-ir^f TVu^ , fWgSfi tWsUflpA-4r> -UtP frP4h Qtv|
SH&s fnireti&iV <*\\& <> ■9^,^^, _
WuLinl &rnr?lo^JU^Aoe£_3k3u.-t
£W-\sgvc\ U^femilWA Jyjj MLy ,fe vfv VrA-~per^ t4uS>
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court erred by admitting evidence taken in violation of the Fourth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Docket Entries
2023-10-16
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2023.
2023-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2023)
Attorneys
Milton Melvin Rodgers
Melvin Melvin Rodgers — Petitioner