No. 23-5391
Walter Raul Maguina v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court due-process evidence extrinsic-evidence harmless-error judicial-procedure prejudice prejudicial-evidence remand
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a district court's failure to address the prejudicial nature of extrinsic evidence requires remand.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court's failure to address the prejudicial nature of extrinsic evidence requires remand
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-08-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2023)
Attorneys
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Walter Raul Maguina
Erik A. Hanshew — Office of Federal Public Defender (TXWD), Petitioner