No. 23-5384
Wayne Lee Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review attorney-withdrawal civil-procedure court-discretion due-process judicial-process legal-petition merits-review procedural-issue supreme-court writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Wk^ther We, Lowe-C C^rt $Vovii Ia flowed co^/\$c I +o w't%d
•froAA Vchho/ie-C 5 ApP&^ j foiow/Mj H\e ?^Hf\ovier Kac$ Aie.fi / -Pof
Brief, fWi \AJ(S$ ^ro-Se +o fke- 6o^f{ o( f\^et-U-row
<N/1
^■^>ees.i tV\ kf? ^f^* 2-**
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court should have allowed counsel to withdraw from petitioner's appeal, knowing the petitioner had issues of merit for an appeal on the appeal level that was presented to the court of appeals
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-08-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Wayne Johnson
Wayne Lee Johnson — Petitioner